Tag Archive for: Universitas Islam Indonesia

Once again, the Indonesian society are faced with a commotion about the claims of traditional culture by the Malaysian society. In this cases that have arisen are related to Tarian Tor-Tor dan Gondang Sambilan (Sembilan Gendang) originating from the Mandailing society of North Sumatra. The interesting thing about this incident is that many parties feel “angry” on what has been done by the Malaysia. From the ordinary people to politicians. Because of this commotion, one question has really raised a question, is there a commitment by the State to guarantee the protection of traditional culture?

 

Constitutional Guarantee in Protecting Traditional Culture

According to the Preamble to the 1945 Constitution, it is clear that one of the objectives of the establishment of the State of Indonesia is within the framework of protecting the entire Indonesian nation and all of its bloodshed. It means that the State is obliged to be able to provide protection for both human and non-human resources. In the context of non-human resources, the State should be able to protect both natural and non-natural resources, there are no exception in terms of protecting traditional culture.

In accordance with this issue, based on the constitution bodies there are several provisions that provide direction as well as firm guarantees for the protection of traditional culture. The basic of constitutional in the context of protecting traditional culture is stated in Article 18B paragraph (2) of the second amendment to the 1945 Constitution which stated that “The state recognizes and respects customary law community units and their traditional rights as long as they are still alive and in accordance with community development and the principle of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia as regulated in the Law.” and Article 28I paragraph (3) of the second amendment to the 1945 Constitution which reads as follows: Cultural identity and rights of traditional communities are respected in line with the development of times and civilizations”. In addition to the above provisions, Article 32 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of the fourth amendment to the 1945 Constitution provide a basis for further strengthening the direction and guarantees of the constitution on the importance of protecting traditional culture in Indonesia.

 

 

Loss of Traditional Cultural Protection Guarantee

Based on the currently issue which is developing regarding Malaysia’s efforts with the recording of Tarian Tor-Tor dan Gondang Sambilan (Sembilan Gendang) as cultural heritage, which is really concerning. This concern arises because this case is not the first case but has become a case for the umpteenth time related to traditional culture. The question is, in this context can the State be considered to have lost its commitment to guarantee the protection of traditional culture?

Talking about the state’s commitment to guarantee the protection of traditional culture, it is actually not enough to just express it in the form of normative formulations in the constitution, but there are no more tangible actions. In reality, the State has lost its commitment to guarantee the protection of traditional culture. There are two parameters that the commitment of the State has actually been lost in providing guarantees for the protection of traditional culture. The two parameters are;

First, in the context of case resolution, it appears that the State is unable to complete the settlement of cases of claims of traditional culture by foreign parties completely and clearly. From the Batik case to Tarian Tor-Tor, the state can only remain silent without a clear attitude to resolve the case. Even if there is a response, this does not solve the case completely. Recognition by UNESCO of several traditional cultures has not resolved the problem of protecting traditional cultures, as evidenced by the case for other types of traditional cultures. On the other hand, efforts to encourage all traditional cultures to be recognized by UNESCO may not necessarily be carried out due to strict requirements and may be inefficient.

 Second, in the context of developing a legal system, the State is unable to develop legislation that leads to the development of a traditional cultural protection system. In fact, if you look at the provisions of Article 18B paragraph (2) of the Second Amendment to the 1945 Constitution, the constitution explicitly requires that in the framework of respecting traditional rights which also includes the protection of traditional culture, a statutory provision should be made that can optimize the intent of Article 18B paragraph (2). the 18B. In fact, until now the expected legislation has not appeared. In the past, the Directorate General of Intellectual Property Rights at the Ministry of Law and Human Rights had indeed drafted a Bill on the Protection and Utilization of Traditional Culture, but the bill itself so far has not shown a clear end to its origins. Therefore, this can be interpreted that it is true that the State has lost its commitment to guarantee the protection of traditional culture.

Wallahu’alam bis Shawab.

Prof. Dr. Budi Agus Riswandi, S.H., M.Hum.

                                                Director of Intellectual Property Rights Center

Faculty of Law UII Yogyakarta

 

On Friday, April 26 2013, the international community celeberate the 13th intellectual property rights day. In this context, this warning is often used as a momentum by the international community and countries in the world to further strengthen the importance of IPR in encouraging the progress of human civilization. Currently, the theme carried by WIPO in commemoration of the 13th World Intellectual Property Rights Day is “Innovation for the Next Generation”, while the theme raised by the Directorate General of Intellectual Property Rights is “Continuous Innovation for National Glory”.

For the Indonesia, IPR should become a collective awareness in order to improve the welfare of the people. To achieve this, the IPR movement really must be able to involve all components of the nation’s children. The IPR movement should not only be partial, sporadic, and carried out by a handful of groups without a clear direction, but should be a comprehensive, systemic movement, and involve the widest participation of the community by focusing on a goal,which is building Indonesian society welfare through IPR.

Notes on Awareness of IPR

The Indonesian nation has always been perceived as a society that has not optimally possessed IPR awareness. This perception is actually more due to several reasons. There are at least two reasons that strengthen this, consist of; First, there are still rampant IPR violations committed by the Indonesian society. For example, in the case of music and song violations, according to Member of the Board of Management of the Indonesian Recording Industry Association, Jusak Irwan Sutiono, there are illegal sales of Indonesian song downloads amounting to more than 6 million songs. For example, 1 song costs Rp. 3,000, so the potential loss for Indonesia aka the music industry per day is Rp. 18 billion/day.; Second, the low number of IPR applications submitted by the Indonesian people, especially in terms of filing patent applications. According to data from the Directorate General of Intellectual Property Rights, overseas PCT patents amounted to 4839, Domestic PCT patents amounted to 8 in 2011.

In other side of the perception that the awareness of IPR in Indonesia is not optimal, this is also inseparable from the weakness of the IPR management system both at the center and in the regions. Indications of the weakness of the IPR management system can be seen when IPR is currently considered a matter for the Ministry of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia if it is in the Central Government, while IPR becomes a matter for the Department of Industry and Trade if it is in the Regional Government.

In conclusion, it is possible that the issue of IPR awareness in Indonesia is actually a serious matter. It happened because of the low understanding of IPR of the Indonesian society, is not only experienced by people who incidentally are IPR actors, such as creators, designers, inventors and so on, but also experienced by government officials both at the Central and Regional levels, which incidentally is the government apparatus. It is hoped that it can build awareness of IPR in the Indonesian people even better.

Collective Movement of IPR Awareness

Based on the reality of IPR awareness among Indonesian society, it is clear that the Indonesian society in terms of building IPR awareness are still being carried out partially, sporadically, not focused and the parties involved are still very few. Partial nature of IPR awareness. As a result, the IPR conscious movement has only become a routine and only belongs to a handful of certain community groups. In addition, the development of the IPR system both at the center and in the regions is developing slowly and tends not to be responsive to the needs of the community itself.

Realizing this issue, the momentum of the 13th World Intellectual Property Rights Day on 26 April 2013 should be used by the Indonesian society as a starting point for moving awareness of collective intellectual property rights. By building a collective IPR conscious movement, of course, IPR that has been developed and implemented in Indonesia can ultimately have an impact on efforts to realize the welfare of the Indonesian people themselves. This, of course, is also in line with the purpose of IPR as stated in Article 7 of the TRIPS Agreement that IPR is basically developed and applied to improve the welfare of the community.

Wallahu’alam bis Shawab.

Prof. Dr. Budi Agus Riswandi, S.H., M.Hum.

                                                Director of Intellectual Property Rights Center

Faculty of Law UII Yogyakarta

Do you still remember the case of the Sulotco Kalosi Toraja Coffee Brand with a picture of a Toraja house registered and owned by IFES Inc. Corporation California with Registration Number 74547000. This is very extraordinary learning. One of them, it turns out that many foreign parties are currently increasing the competitiveness of their products through mentoring on behalf of the typical and quality products of the Indonesian nation. From this case, it is very important that the names of these distinctive and quality products can be protected through the Geographical Indication (GI) system in order to increase product competitiveness.

Geographical Indications: Regional Marks for /Special Products

Perhaps all this time we have known that in Indonesia there are several products that have uniqueness and quality and this is at the same time a superior product. Some of these products such as Salak Pondoh Sleman, Kopi Kitamani Bali, Lada Putih Muntok, Tembakau Mole Sumedang and many others. These products are basically products that have the potential to be registered with their GI.

GI is a sign that is used for goods that have a certain geographical origin and also have the quality or reputation caused by the place of origin. In general, GI consists of the name of the place of origin of the goods. The purpose of GI registration is so that the product can be legally protected. Protection against GI is collective, which is protection given to a product produced by a product produced by a certain area (Sugiono Moeljopawiro and Surip Mawardi, 2010).

GI was appeared and born in several centuries ago at Europe. GI itself includes the name of the place of origin of the goods. GI is a sign used on goods that have a specific regional origin and have the quality and reputation caused by the place of origin (Dora de Teresa, 2003). In the world, there are many products with quality and reputation due to the demand for GI. It is like; champagne wine (France), Parmigiano cheese (Italy), brandy pisco (Peru)—these products have been registered as GI in Indonesia (Riyaldi, 2012).

In the manner of paying attention to the definition of GI, it is clear that GI is a sign used for products that have distinctive and quality, where the sign refers to the regional name of the product.

Implications of GI Certification on Product Competitiveness Improvement

GI was appeared in the World Trade Organization (WTO) as part of the Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs), particularly in Article 22 paragraph (1) of the TRIPs Agreement. GI is usually used to mark products that have specificity and quality caused by geographical factors, both natural and/or human factors. To obtain the GI it must be register.

GI registration itself is a legal mechanism that is carried out by means of labeling products to the Directorate General of Intellectual Property Rights of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights where to obtain the label there must be a product standard both in terms of institutional and governance as well as the quality and characteristics of the product as outlined in the GI registration. requirements book. The requirements book is a requirement for GI registration, which has a function if the GI label for a typical product is approved by the Director General of Intellectual Property Rights, then the typical product must be produced by the product community by referring to the requirements book.

In the manner of taking into the things above, GI basically can be equated with efforts to standardize the typical products of a region. This understanding can be known because to obtain the certificate of GI, a typical product community must first have product quality standards that can explain the uniqueness of the product.

Furthermore, by registering GI for distinctive and quality products, the following benefits will be obtained: First, on a macro basis it is hoped that it will improve the welfare of the community of distinctive and quality products and other communities around the community of typical and quality products; Second, legally the unique and quality products that exist in each region can be protected in legally; and Third, in terms of quality and grade, the competitiveness of distinctive and high-quality products in their respective regions will be able to be further improved.

Wallahu’ala’bis shawab

 

Prof. Dr. Budi Agus Riswandi, S.H., M.Hum.

                                                Director of Intellectual Property Rights Center

Faculty of Law UII Yogyakarta

and Chairman of the Association of Indonesian Intellectual Property Center (ASKII)

 

 

The news about the widespread practice of plagiarism of scientific work in universities with a quantity up to 100 lecturers with the purpose to carry out promotions from the lector, head lector to professor level is something that is both concerning and heart breaking in the context of the future of higher education in Indonesia. However a university which incidentally is an institution that prints the nation’s next generation and is expected to produce true intellectuals both in terms of knowledge and integrity that has been tainted by acts of plagiarism committed by lecturers as educators in universities.

Therefore, it is common when there is an act of plagiarism in such a way, it should begin to reflect on how this nation responds to the rampant acts of plagiarism.

Plagiarism and Dishonesty

Plagiarism is a term that is very well known among scientists and intellectuals. The term plagiarism actually refers to an act in the context of making scientific work that does not pay attention to the rules and ethics of writing scientific papers. For example, citing people’s opinions without mentioning the source. Meanwhile, people who commit acts of plagiarism are often called plagiarists.

There is a relationship between plagiarism and the morality of this nation. The practice of plagiarism among scientists and intellectuals is basically an act that is considered unethical/immoral. The concrete form of this immoral act is represented in terms of the dishonesty of scientists or intellectuals for the knowledge they develop.

If we pay attention to the form of dishonesty, it is a moral basis that is now very rare to find in Indonesia. It seems that in this country it is very difficult to find honest people than to find smart people. Therefore, it becomes a serious problem when this act of plagiarism continues to escalate in Indonesia. However, it becomes serious problem because it is believed that the widespread dishonesty of educators/lecturers in making scientific works will have a further impact on other dishonesty in the development of education in Indonesia. As a result, it is not surprising that the quality of the integrity of education is currently very low.

So, it is not surprising that in the practice of everyday life, almost most of the Indonesian people, along with the administration of the government, live their lives full of pretense if it is not said that they live with full of dishonesty. The closest example today, can be seen in the case of the arrest of the chairman of the Constitutional Court, where he was a doctor who was later caught red-handed by the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). In fact, previously he seemed fierce with the symptoms of corruption in Indonesia. This is a fact that we cannot ignore.

Anti Plagiarism Social Movement

Seeing the implications of plagiarism for the future of this very dangerous nation, the government and other related institutions, such as educational institutions should seriously take strategic steps to eliminate the act of plagiarism itself. At least the act of plagiarism can be suppressed in such a way.

One thing that needs to be done in this context is to make the anti-plagiarism movement as social movement. The anti-plagiarism social movement is an extension of the legal movement and is the embodiment of strategic steps in suppressing plagiarism itself. The intended social movement is to invite all components of this nation to agree to say no to all forms of plagiarism.

It is expected that with this kind of social movement, social sanctions will be able to intensify legal sanctions. However, these two sanctions can be used as effective means going forward to preventing plagiarism which has become the source of this nation’s moral depravity. In addition, with the existence of these two kinds of sanctions, it is expected that Indonesia can truly realize the commitment of the founding fathers of this nation, specifically the intellectual life of the nation and the welfare of the Indonesian people.

Prof. Dr. Budi Agus Riswandi, S.H., M.Hum.

                                              Director of Intellectual Property Rights Center

Faculty of Law UII Yogyakarta

 

Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Indonesia has been committed to fully supporting all outbound mobility programs that are followed by its students. This is evidenced by the participation of students in the Indonesian International Student Mobility Awards (IISMA) and the Credit Transfer Program. There are two of  Faculty of Law UII students that have been selected to take part in the IISMA program at the University of Sussex, UK and the University of Warsaw, Poland. As for the transfer credit program, Faculty of Law UII has built a partnership with Youngsan University in South Korea. Both programs are planned to be implemented in September in 2021. Therefore Faculty of Law UII holds a Pre Departure Program event to equip the  participants who participate in these two programs.

The Pre Departure Program event was held for two days, namely on August 9 and 10, 2021. The event presented several speakers, both Faculty of Law UII lecturers and speakers from related institutions. On the first day of the Pre Departure Program, began with a briefing on “UII’s Commitment” which was delivered by the Dean of Faculty of Law UII, Dr. Abdul Jamil, S.H., M.H. The second session discussed “Academic Commitment During Study Abroad” which was conveyed by the Head of Undergraduate Program in Law (PSHPS), Prof. Dr. Budi Agus Riswandi, S.H., M.Hum. The third session was filled with debriefing on “Consolidating Worship and Morals during Study Abroad” which was delivered by the Secretary of Undergraduate Program in Law (PSHPS) UII, Mr. Ari Wibowo, S.H., S.HI., M.H. and the last session was filled by the Secretary of International Undergraduate Program in Law UII Mr. Dodik Setiawan Nur Heriyanto, S.H., M.H., LL.M., Ph.D. which discusses “Departure Preparation (Non-Academic) and Explanation of the Joint and Credit Transfer Program.

On the second day of the event, Faculty of Law UII invited five speakers who discussed preparations related to psychological readiness when living and studying abroad, discussions related to cultural awareness in destination countries, explanations regarding health protocols during travel and studying abroad and the last one is sharing session with Faculty of Law UII students who have participated in the Double Degree program at Youngsan University. The first session was filled by Mrs. Dr.rer.nat. Dian Sari Utami S. Psi. M.A., who provided briefing on Psychological Readiness. The second session was filled with briefing on Cultural Awareness in South Korea, England and Poland which was delivered by Mr. Riefki Fajar Ganda Wiguna, S.Pd., M.Hum. The third session was filled with briefing on “Explanation of Health Protocols during Travel and Study in South Korea, England and Poland” which was delivered by Dr. dr. H. Ferry Ardiyanto, MMR from the Indonesian Doctors Association (IDI). The last session was filled by Yuwan Zaghlul Ismail and Kurniawan Sutrisno Hadi. They are Faculty of Law UII students who are currently studying for a double degree at Youngsan University. They filled the last session by sharing their experiences while studying at Youngsan University.

The enthusiasm of the participants was visible in the program with the many questions asked. There were a total of five participants who took part in this event. Two participants are IISMA delegates and three participants are Credit Transfer Program delegates. The participants asked questions about the program and also expressed their concerns about studying abroad. One of the questions they asked was about how to deal with religious and cultural differences that could affect their daily lives when living abroad and so on. The questions and concerns raised by the participants can be answered properly by the speakers so that the participants are more enthusiastic in participating the outbound mobility program. At the end of the event, the moderator made an announcement regarding the most active participants in this event. The participants were Akhiruddin Sahputra Lubis and Aryana Sekar Widyaningsih. Both participants received prizes in the form of interesting souvenirs from Faculty of Law UII.

(Yogyakarta) Geographical Indications as one of the intellectual property rights regimes have the potential to advance the society economy in certain areas. Magelang Regency has produced one Geographical Indication product, namely Beras Mentik Wangi Susu Sawangan. This rice is produced in Sawangan, Magelang Regency, Central Java.

Geographical Indication Area of Beras Mentik Wangi Susu Sawangan

The application for registration of Geographical Indications was made by the Society for the Protection of Geographical Indications of Beras Mentik Wangi Susu Sawangan (MPIGBMWSS) and a management structure has been formed, which consists of members of the rice farmers of Mentik Wangi Sawangan. Application for registration of Geographical Indications which is currently in the certification process at the Directorate General of Intellectual Property of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights.

Geographical Indication Logo of Beras Mentik Wangi Susu Sawangan

The Geographical Indication Registration is accompanied directly by the Center for Intellectual Property Rights, Law, Technology and Business (PHKIHTB) Faculty of Law UII. Director of PHKIHTB Dr.Budi Agus Riswandi, SH., M.Hum as an IPR consultant directly oversees and assists the process of completing both substantive and administrative requirements. Starting from determining the name of the Geographical Indication used, Standard Operating Procedure (SOP), and all the completeness of the requirements book.

The use of the name Beras Mentik Wangi Susu Sawangan is actually the name of the national superior variety, namely Beras Mentik Wangi Susu. However, because there are indeed characteristics that come from natural also human factors and the rice is produced in Sawangan, then name that was taken and agreed upon was Beras Mentik Wangi Susu Sawangan. (Putri Yan Dwi Akasih)

 

 

The Faculty of Law of the Universitas Islam Indonesia in collaboration with Coventry University, UK, organized the Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL) Project 2020. COIL Project 2020 takes the theme of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): United Kingdom (UK) and the Indonesian Legal Context. This program is the first integrated online lecture program in Indonesia, bringing in lecturers from the UK and Indonesia. COIL Project 2020 was held from 16 to 22 December 2020, every 19.45 WIB until 21.30 WIB.

The COIL Project is a program created by Coventry University to carry out international online courses. This program was attended by around 165 students from the Undergraduate Program, the Master of Law Program, and the Notarial Law Program of the Faculty of Law of Universitas Islam Indonesia. The lecturers who teach are also experts and law practitioners from the Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Indonesia and Coventry University. These students undertake a six-day program, which is the equivalent of two credits at Coventry University. As the final output, COIL Project participants will provide scientific comments on CSR and Business Ethics Blog.

According to the Chair of the Indonesian Regional Committee, Dodik Setiawan Nur Heriyanto, S.H., M.H., LLM., Ph.D., this program is the first international online course program in Indonesia. COIL Project 2020 was held online for six days through the Zoom. “For the technical issues, we have been assisted by IT Support from the Faculty of Law (Universitas Islam Indonesia) so that the program runs smoothly”, explained Dodik Setiawan.

The COIL Project 2020 was opened by the Dean of the Faculty of Law UII, Dr. Abdul Jamil, S.H., M.H., and Coventry University’s Chief Editor of CSR and Business Ethics Blog, Associate Professor Dr. Costantino Grasso LLB, PGDip, LLM, Ph.D., Wednesday (16/12/2020). In his remarks, Abdul Jamil appreciated the implementation of the program and collaboration with Coventry University. Through the 2020 COIL Project, Abdul Jamil hopes that the participants will gain new experiences and knowledge about corporate social responsibility. According to Constantino Grasso, corporate social responsibility has become a separate subject at Coventry University. Through the COIL Project 2020 with FH UII, it is hoped that many new perspectives will emerge in this scientific field.

The program, which was attended by 165 students, was filled with experts and practitioners from Indonesia and England. The lecturers are Dr. Costantino Grasso LLB, PGDip, LLM, Ph.D, Dr. Nadia Naim, John Christensen, Dr. Donato Vozza LLB, PGDip, Ph.D, Dr. Budi Agus Riswandi, SH, M.Hum., Eko Riyadi, SH, MH, Dodik Setiawan Nur Heriyanto, SH, MH, LL.M., Ph.D., Ahmad Sadzali, Lc., MH, and Christopher M. Cason , JD., LL.M.

 

The Conduct of COIL Project 2020

The second day of the COIL Project 2020 was held on Thursday (17/12/2020). Lecturers who fill in are John Christensen, Director and founder of the Global Tax Justice Network, and Dr. Donato Vozza LLB, PGDip, Ph.D., from Coventry University’s Center for Financial and Corporate Integrity Studies (CFCI). John Christensen delivered material on moral economic responsibility in the tax profession in companies, while Donatto Vozza discussed the protection of witnesses and whistleblowers in cases of violations of social responsibility by companies.

On the third day, Friday (18/12/2020), filled by Dr. Budi Agus Riswandi, S.H., M.Hum., From FH UII and Dr. Nadia Naim from Coventry University. Budi Agus Riswandi presented material on how strengthening intellectual property can affect the optimization of corporate social responsibility.

The fourth day is held on Saturday (19/12/2020). On the fourth day, there were two speakers, namely the Director of the Center for Human Rights Studies at UII, Eko Riyadi, S.H., M.H., and Christopher M. Cason, JD., LL.M, a permanent lecturer at FH UII. Eko Riyadi delivered material on the relationship between human rights and business activities. Eko Riyadi pointed out how the conduct of business activities often results in human rights violations. Meanwhile, Christopher Cason delivered material on the effectiveness of implementing social responsibility by companies from the perspective of the United States.

On the fifth day, Monday (21/12/2020), filled by Ahmad Sadzali, Lc., M.H., and Dodik Setiawan Nur Heriyanto, SH, MH, LLM, Ph.D, from FH UII. Ahmad Sadzali delivered material about Islamic law regarding corporate social responsibility. Meanwhile, Dodik Setiawan delivered material regarding the regulation of corporate responsibility in international law.

In order to support the creation of an outcome in the form of providing scientific comments on the CSR and Business Ethics Blog by the participants, a Writing Camp was held on the sixth day, Tuesday (22/12/2020). Through sessions such as workshops, the participants were instructed on how to technically make scientific commentary material in English. This sixth-day session was guided by two tutors, namely Nur Gemilang Mahardika, S.H., LL.M. and Rahadian Diffaul Barraq Suwartono, S.H.

The implementation of the COIL Project 2020 is the first time at UII and in Indonesia. Previously, Coventry University had carried out the COIL Project with several universities in Europe, such as Paris Nanterre University, University Carlos III, and Copenhagen Business School. The participants of the COIL Project 2020 will later receive a certificate directly from Coventry University. “This event is very special as if we have brought our students to study at Coventry University”, said Dodik Setiawan as Chairman of the Indonesian Regional Committee.

Come and Join COIL Project 2020,

 

Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Indonesia in collaboration with Coventry University present the Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL) Project 2020 that will be conducted on 16-22 December 2020. With the topic on Corporate Social Responsibilities (CSR). This program is the first on Indonesia and for each participant will get official certificate from Coventry University, UK. All the participants are equivalent to participating in academic activities at Coventry University. All the activities will be conducted online. The outcome from this program is a blog writing, with around 200-500 words from each participant, that will focusing on giving comments for ideas/review/analysis on blog (click here). For the best participant with published comment on the blog will get merchandise (certificate, voucher, and souvenir).

 

This program is opened for all students from Undergraduate Study Program (International Program and Regular Program), Master in Law Program, and Master in Public Notary Program of Universitas Islam Indonesia.

 

The registration has been closed

 

the Term of Reference can be downloaded here (click here).
for the Participant Rules can be downloaded here (click here).

 

——————————————————————————————————————————

 

Fakultas Hukum UII bekerjasama dengan Coventry University menyelenggarakan Collaborative Online International Learning Project 2020 yang akan diselenggarakan pada tanggal 16-22 Desember 2020. Tema umum yang diangkat adalah CSR (tanggungjawab sosial perusahaan). Program ini pertama kali diselenggarakan di Indonesia dan setiap peserta akan mendapatkan sertifikat resmi dan langsung dari Coventry University, Inggris. Sehingga peserta telah dianggap setara mengikuti kegiatan akademik di Coventry University. Seluruh kegiatan akan diselenggarakan secara daring (online). Luaran dari kegiatan ini adalah tulisan kurang lebih 200-500 kata (1 halaman) dari setiap peserta untuk membahas dan memberikan tanggapan terhadap gagasan/ulasan/analisis blog (klik disini). Bagi peserta yang terbaik dan peserta dengan komentar blog yang berhasil dipublikasikan maka akan mendapatkan hadiah yang menarik (sertifikat, voucher, dan souvenir).

 

Program ini dibuka untuk mahasiswa baik Program Studi Hukum (Program Internasional dan Reguler), Prodi Magister Hukum, dan Prodi Magister Kenotariatan di lingkungan UII.

 

Pendaftaran telah ditutup

 

TOR dapat diunduh di sini (klik disini).

Tata Tertib bagi Peserta dapat diunduh di sini (klik disini).

The Faculty of Law of the Universitas Islam Indonesia (UII) held a 2020 Coordination Meeting to Concepting Working Plan (Rakorja) on Sunday (27-09-2020). The UII FH Coordination Meeting 2020 this time carries the theme theme “Bertahan; Berbenah; Tumbuh; dalam Rangka Mencetak Lulusan FH Berintegritas dan Profesional (Defending; Clean up; Grow; in Order to Produce Faculty of Law’s Graduate with Integrity and Professional)”. Implementation of this Rakorja is different from previous years because it is carried out online. This is a reminder of the high number of cases of Covid-19 transmission in Indonesia. The implementation of this Rakorja was carried out in a hybrid manner from the Main Meeting Room, 3rd Floor of FH UII and was attended by around 25 people. Although many participants realized, the implementation of the Faculty of Law’s Rakorja 2020  was carried out in accordance with health protocols.

In his speech, the Dean of Faculty of Law UII, Assoc Professor Dr. Abdul Jamil, SH., MH., said that the implementation of this Rakorja had complied with the existing health protocols. Abdul Jamil, who is also the Chairperson of the UII Siaga Covid 19 Team, said that all coordination meetings paid attention to existing health protocols. “We have opened the windows, we have also opened the doors so that the air can circulate properly”, said Abdul Jamil.

The Rakorja was opened by the Rector of UII, Prof. Fathul Wahid, ST, M, Sc., Ph.D ,. In his remarks, Fathul Wahid praised the willingness of Faculty of Law UII lecturers to organize activities amidst the existing busy schedule. “This is proof that you are good people, because they volunteered for the meeting on Sunday,” said Fathul Wahid, responded with laughter from the participants.

According to Fathul Wahid, the pandemic condition is the main challenge for universities in Indonesia, including UII. “This pandemic condition has a tremendous impact. This condition will greatly affect our future policy direction”, he said. According to Fathul Wahid, many private universities could barely survive this pandemic. “Alhamdulillah, UII after doing the ‘belt tightening” managed to survive until it has a salary cash reserve of up to 12 months, “added Fathul Wahid optimistically.

Fathul Wahid conveyed that this pandemic condition should not be considered merely as an obstacle, but must also be seen as a momentum. This is the meaning of the UII’s Rakorja theme. “We have to quickly adapt,” said Fathul Wahid. The online learning system is one form of momentum referred to by Fathul Wahid. According to him, during the pandemic, UII has been ‘forced’ to develop a good online learning system. It is projected that this system will not continue to end after the pandemic is over, but will continue to be developed. The main objective is to increase the usefulness of UII’s existence in Indonesia. “I imagine if we can make online meetings permanent. It can also be used as a mixture of online and offline. ”, Said Fathul Wahid.

The Faculty of Law UII itself has an optimistic view in welcoming this Rakorja. According to Abdul Jamil, Faculty of Law of the UII will aim to have at least five professors in the next 2021 period. This was as conveyed by Abdul Jamil in his presentation of the 2021 FH UII Dean Work Program. “The 2021 target will be 5 professors,” said Abdul Jamil.

The implementation of the Faculty of Law’s Rakorja was carried out with strict health protocols. The organizing committee provides medical masks for all participants. “The Faculty of Law UII gives full concentration on how to maintain the health of the Faculty of Law UII civitas academica during the pandemic period,” said Abdul Jamil.

The Faculty of Law of the Universitas Islam Indonesia (UII) held the Coordination Meeting to Gather Inputs for Civitas academics (Pra Rakorja) of Faculty of Law UII, on Monday (21-09-2020). This Pra-Rakorja organizing is different from previous years because it is carried out online. This is due to the fact that there are still high cases of Covid-19 transmission in Indonesia. The pre-coordination meeting was attended by more than 150 participants.

In the implementation of this Pra-Rakorja, the Dean of Faculty of Law UII, Associate Professor Dr. Abdul Jamil, SH., MH., conveyed several points of explanation on the dean’s work program. One of them is professor acceleration. “The target in 2021, we will have five professors,” said Abdul Jamil.

Currently, Faculty of Law UII has six professors. This was conveyed in Abdul Jamil’s presentation at the 2020 Pra-Rakorja with the theme “Bertahan; Berbenah; Tumbuh; dalam Rangka Mencetak Lulusan FH Berintegritas dan Profesional (Defending; Clean up; Grow; in Order to Produce Faculty of Law’s Graduate with Integrity and Professional”. According to Abdul Jamil, currently Faculty of Law UII has 107 lecturers, but only has six professors. So, a stimulus is needed to immediately accelerate professors at Faculty of Law UII.

Abdul Jamil also said that this year’s Pra-Rakorja was carried out under special conditions. The Pra-Rakorja meeting was forced to not be carried out ‘face-to-face’ or offline due to the Covid-19 pandemic. The condition of the Covid-19 Pandemic is also the biggest challenge for Faculty of Law UII in implementing this year’s work program. Therefore, according to Abdul Jamil, Faculty of Law UII must ‘clean up’ and try to adjust to the situation in the new normal period. “In 2021 we must improve, we must be able to adjust the site. When we can make adjustments to the situation, and when the situation is normal, we must immediately ‘run’, to achieve the achievements for 2021, “said Abdul Jamil.

During the Pra-Rakorja presentation, Abdul Jamil also conveyed several flagship programs and activities in 2021. One of the flagship work programs is preparing the international accreditation of the Foundation for International Business Administration Accreditation (FIBAA). “We will prepare FIBAA accreditation for the undergraduate program, and international accreditation for the Master of Law Program and Notary Program”, said Abdul Jamil.

Beside the Professors Acceleration Program and FIBAA Accreditation, Faculty of Law UII also launched many internationalization programs in 2021. One of them is to conducting Research Collaboration with Ahmad Ibrahim Kuliyah of Laws International Islamic University Malaysia (AIKOLS IIUM).

The Pra-Rakorja will be followed by a Coordination Meeting to Concepting Working Plan (Rakorja) on Sunday (27-09-2020). Through the Pra-Rakorja, which was attended by all lecturers and education staff at Faculty of Law UII, it is hoped that it can provide constructive input for the implementation of the Coordination Meeting. “Therefore, we hope for input from all ladies and gentlemen for the smooth running of the Pra-Rakorja today,” said Abdul Jamil.