Efektivitas Sanksi Dalam Hukum Perdagangan Internasional

Nandang Sutrisno, S.H., LL.M., M.Hum., Ph.D.

Universitas Islam Indonesia

Lihat

Penelitian ini mengkaji tentang efektivitas sanksi dalam hukum perdagangan internasional, khususnya sanksi yang dijatuhkan dalam proses penyelesaian sengketa di World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement Body(DSB). Hal ini didasari oleh kecenderungan umum bahwa sanksi dalam hukum internasional, baik secara teoretis maupun praktis, kerap kali diabaikan, meskipun tidak sampai menghapus karakteristik bahwa hukum internasional adalah hukum. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normative dengan pendekatan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa dalam praktiknya, secara umum putusan WTO melalui DSB atau mekanisme lain di WTO efektif, dalam arti telah ditaati oleh para anggota yang terlibat dalam sengketa. Meskipun demikian, dalam beberapa kasus, Negara-negara anggota tertentu menunjukkan keengganannya untuk menaati putusan DSB.

Kata-kata kunci: sanksi, putusan DSB. Efektif.

Daftar Pustaka

Buku

Austin, John. (1995). The Province of Jurisprudence Determined.
Hart, H. L. A. (2012). The Concept of Law (3rd Edition). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
O’Brien, John. (2001). International Law. London: Cavendish Publishing Limited.
Triggs, Gillian Doreen. (2006). International Law: Contemporary Principles and Practices.
Australia: LexisNexis Butterworths.

Jurnal

Amal, Ichsanul. (2020). The Future of Israel – Palestinian Conflict: Either One State or Two?.
Global Strategis, 14(1), 63-76.
Bogdanova, Iryna. (2021). Targeted Economic Sanctions and WTO Law: Examining the
Adequacy of the National Security Exception. Legal Issues of Economic Integration,
48(2), 171-200.
Davey, William J. (2009). Compliance Problems in WTO Dispute Settlement. Cornell
International Law Journal, 42(1), 119-128.
Dwiastuti, Ilmi. (2020). The Roots of Israel-Palestine Conflict: A Political Culture Analysis.
AEGIS, 4(2), 19-33 .
Illieva, Jana, Dashtevski, Aleksandar & Kokotovic, Filip. (2018). Economic Sanctions in
International Law. UTMS Journal of Economics, 9(2), 201-211.
Menkes, Jerzy & Kociolek-Peksa, Anna. (2019). Heterogeneity, Compliance and
Enforcement of Public International Law Remarks on Sanctions and
Countermeasures: Legal Theory and The Sociology of Law Approach. Politeja,
6(63), 7-25.
Mercurio, Bryan. (2009). Why Compensation cannot Replace Trade Retaliation in the WTO
Dispute Settlement Understanding. World Trade Review, 8(2), 315-338.
Stoll, Peter-Tobias Stoll & Steinmann, Arthur. (1999). WTO Dispute Settlement: The
Implementation Stage. Max Planck UNYB, 3, 407-437.

Report, Research & Working Paper

Campbell, Caitlin. & Salidjanova, Nargiza. (2016). South China Sea Arbitration Ruling:
What Happened and What’s Next?. US-China Economic and Security Review
Commission.
Cimino-isaacs, Cathleen D. & Fefer, Rachel F. (2021). World Trade Organization:Overview
and Future Direction. Congressional Research Service.
Djoukeng, Fran. (2019). A Guide to Basics of International Law. Georgetown University.
Franco, Chiara. (2015). Coercive Diplomacy, Sanctions and International Law. Report of
the International Conference on Coercive Diplomacy, Sanctions and International
Law by Instituto Affari Internazionali.
Reich, Arie. (2017). The Effectiveness of the WTO Dispute Settlement System: A Statistical
Analysis. European University Institute Working Papers.

Peraturan Perundang-undangan

Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU).

Putusan Pengadilan Internasional

Decision by the Arbitrator, United States — Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil
Aircraft — Second Complaint, WTO Doc. WT/DS353/ARB.
Panel Report, European Communities — Anti-Dumping Measure on Farmed Salmon from
Norway, WTO Doc. WT/DS337/R (diapdosi 15 Januari 2008).
South China Sea Arbitration, Permanent Court of Arbitration [PCA], Philippines v China,
Award, PCA Case No 2013-19, ICGJ 495 (PCA 2016), 12th July 2016.

Internet

Besheer, Margaret. (2022). Russia Blocks UN Resolution Condemning Ukraine Invasion. Diakses
11 Juni 2022, dari https://www.voanews.com/a/russia-blocks-un-resolutioncondemning-ukraine-invasion/6460284.html.
Five years after UNSC Resolution 2334, International Accountability to end the Israeli Occupation
Is More Important than Ever. (2021). Diakses 10 Juni 2022, dari https://reliefweb.int/report/occupied-palestinian-territory/five-years-afterunsc-resolution-2334-international.
List of Annexes Marrakes Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization. Diakses
3 Juni 2022, dari https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/04-wto_e.htm.
Lynk, Michael. (2020). Report of Special Rapporteur, UN. Doc. A/75/532. Diakses 10 Juni
2022, dari
https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Countries/PS/A_75_5
32_AUV.pdf
Philippines Wins South China Sea Against China. (2016). Diakses 10 Juni 2022, dari
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jul/12/philippines-wins-southchina-sea-case-against-china.
Reals, Tucker & Sundby, Alex. (2022). Russia’s War in Ukraine: How It Came to This. Diakses
11 Juni 2022, dari https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ukraine-news-russia-warhow-we-got-here/.
UN Resolution against Ukraine Invasion: Full text. (2022). Diakses 11 Juni 2022, dari
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/3/3/unga-resolution-against-ukraineinvasion-full-text.
World Trade Organization, Diakses tanggal 29 April 2022, dari
https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispustats_e.htm.